Sunday, July 3, 2011

Ambassadors for Christ & The Greatest Commandment of All

(2Cr 5:20 ,KJV)
Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech [you] by us: we pray [you] in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God.

The apostle Paul is reminding us of a profound truth: we are ambassadors for Christ. What is an ambassador? Christians are diplomatic agents from another country (Phil 3:20). As Christians, we are commissioned by the King of Kings to represent Him in the earth. Indeed, we Christians are the very representatives of Heaven!

I urge my fellow brothers and sisters to imitate Christ in regards to how we treat others. We are to treat others the way Christ did in the first century. God cares more about how we treat others than all other religious activities combined. Let's read the greatest commandment of all again:

(Mk 12:30-31)
And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this [is] the first commandment. And the second [is] like, [namely] this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.

Notice Jesus uses the word neighbor, and not friend or relative. We know that even the worst of sinners love their own family and friends. What is to separate Christians from the world is that we are to love others gratuitously -- as God loves us!

In simple terms, we Christians are to be God's voice, hands and feet in the earth in this temporary assignment as ambassadors. The idea to feed the hungry, visit the sick and the ones in prison, and to aid strangers isn't just a good idea, it is the chiefest of commandments (Mat 25:35-46).

In closing, let me encourage us all to rid ourselves of unbecoming attitudes that limit our service to our King. How many time have we seen a homeless person and thought

1) They are making more money than I am panhandling on the street
2) They are drug addicted
3) They failed to plan for their future
4) If a man not work, let him not eat (a perversion/misunderstanding of the Biblical text)

These attitudes "let us off the hook" so that we may circumvent one of the most important commandments of all. As Christians we are called to get involved and to show our neighbors God's unmerited grace through our own actions.

We are the only Jesus some people will ever see and the only Bible some people will ever read. As the body of Christ, we truly are God's voice, hands and feet in the earth. In the first century, God manifested Himself in the person of Christ Jesus (Jhn 14:9). Presently, He manifests Himself in His Church -- the Body of Christ with Jesus as the head.

Friends, we have work to do and time is short. Fulfilling this commandment requires taking some risks and "getting our hands dirty." Aren't you glad that God is a God who isn't afraid of getting His hands dirty when He reached down and brought you and me into the Knowledge of his Son? God is a worker. He expects us to demonstrate His love and grace in this very temporary world.

Sunday, July 18, 2010

God's Word is His Will

God's Word is His will. This is a very simply and important truth that many Christians fail to grasp.

Let's take healing for example. In the Gospels, I can find no instances where Christ failed to meet any need that was brought before him. Often all manner of sicknesses were cured. Hungry people were fed. Broken hearts were mended. It seems you couldn't be in Jesus' presence without being changed.

Having our needs met is fundamental to the Christian faith. Jesus instructed us not to even consider our needs, because God takes it on Himself to meet every one of them.

(Matt 6:25 [KJV])
Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?

There is no problem that God's Word doesn't have a solution for. I know the naysayers claim that God has retired and His promised were for a by-gone era. But these people do not know the Jesus of the Gospels. Jesus never changes and he is still moved with compassion. He still takes care of every need of His followers.

Jesus' Word is His will and we don't even have to pray about God's will concerning our needs, including healing, marriage restoration, financial problems (etc ...) or any of the promised we find in the Bible.

Friday, July 16, 2010

I'm only human!

I'm only human. This is one of the best known clichés at lest in the Western world. This term is always used in a pessimistic sense, to explain or excuse our mistakes and shortcomings. Lots of people have this same attitude toward God.

"I'm not all that I should be," many say, "but I'm only human." To some extent this is a true and healthy attitude. In this fallen world, no Christian has "arrived on the Great Plateau." Even St. Paul claimed that he was still pressing toward the mark (Phil 3:14, KJV).

But the Bible teaches us that good can come from our weaknesses, shortcomings and sicknesses.

(2Cor 12:9, KJV)
And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.

The Apostle Paul went on to say that he takes pleasures in such things, because it's at those times when God can especially manifest His great power in his life.

(2Cor 12:10)
Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong.

So what about sickness? According to Jesus, it serves the same purpose. When the disciples encountered a blind man, they assumed that the blindness was the result of the man's sin (Jn 9:1). The Jewish disciples believed in the retribution principle: if you or your parents sinned, sickness would result. Jesus dispelled this notion:

(John 9:3, KJV)
Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.

According to Jesus sickness is an open door for God to show us His great healing power. Afflictions are an open door for God to show us his strength; Afflictions, I believe make up closer to God (Ps 34:18).

So let's never again use the phrase "I'm only human" in a negative manner. For every affliction and shortcoming, God has a remedy. In our weakest moment, God will strengthen us.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

More Posts to Come

I believe God is dealing with me about writing more posts here. It's a little odd because:

  1. I feel inadequate
  2. Nobody reads this blog anyway
But I do feel like I have a lot to say and I enjoy writing. On the last day, I do not want to explain to God why I didn't obey Him. I don't want to have that conversation, so look for more posts.

Just a few random thoughts here:

I am a Pentecostal because I believe God still inspires people today. I believe God still heals, saves, and delivers from anything the devil can put on us. The devil has no predicament that God doesn't have a remedy for.

That is why He sent His Son, Jesus.

If the enemy has power to tempt us, to entrap us, to bring us into bondage, how much more power does God have to save and deliver us?

Finally, I have been listening to John Ortberg's podcasts and the past few weeks I have been blown away. That guy is a preaching machine, even if he is a Presbyterian. Actually I have been listening to him for years now. Often I listen to his sermons two or three times and I am still learning/catching new things in his sermons. It's like listening to an inspired college professor. So if you want to hear some interesting sermons, check out Dr. John Ortberg's stuff HERE. You will be challenged.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

The Role of Women in the Church

The role of women in the Church is still a hot-button issue for many. Prohibitionists use certain passages from Paul's letters as proof-texts, while egalitarians try to see the larger context of such verses. Paul clearly supported women in ministry; indeed, he could not possibly have meant for them to simply “be silent” (1 Tm 2:11, NIV) since it would contradict the Prophet Joel's description of the last days and Paul's own exhortation for women to prophesy with their heads covered (1 Cor 11:5, NIV) . Further, such a stance on women in ministry is not consistent with the workings of the early church. Additionally, Paul's writings do not support the notion that women were not permitted in leadership positions.

In the first century, Jewish women were thought to be completely inferior to their male counterpart. Observant men would generally not speak to women outside of family. It was believed that nothing good could come from conversing with women because women were uneducated and thought not to be very bright. In fact, it was felt that such a conversation might allow a woman to seduce the man; thus, only bad things could happen by talking to a woman1. Following this line of thought, the women were not even taught the Torah and were segregated from the men in the synagogues. Women were not counted in the number required to have a prayer meeting. The synagogue prayer recited at each service included the words, "Blessed art thou, O Lord, who has not made me a woman."

To understand the role of women in the early Church, one needs to look no further than the New Testament texts that state their position and role. We would expect to find unity in the role women were playing and the teachings of the New Testament. Finally, an exegetical exploration of certain passages is in order. We must somehow insert ourselves into the early church at Corinth and hear Paul speaking to us again.

Too often Christians forget that Paul’s “books” are not books at all. It would be unfair to label them even as pamphlets. The letters have had been of immeasurable importance in shaping Christianity— especially those of the reformed traditions. God’s Word is alive and well within Paul’s writings.

However, that does not mean that we can “proof-text” important Biblical doctrines without examining its cultural, literary, and historical context2. The Mickelsen’s explain: “The basic context of any passage is the entire book.” “We dare not so interpret the Bible that we have Christ or the Apostle Paul teaching something contrary to their own practice.”3 Modern Christians are a world away from the original culture and traditions of the early Church. Correct hermeneutics is not always an easy task. Even simple passages often had different, if only slightly, meanings to the original hearers—the early Church. Applying Paul’s teachings to the church today requires some detective work.

We will begin our exegetical study in 1 Corinthians. Paul wrote to the mostly Gentile church at Corinth in order to answer some question and address some reports that he had received. Paul wrote the letter from Ephesus to the saints of Corinth to clear up some misunderstandings concerning fundamental Christian ethics and how the church should operate.

WE ARE TO WORSHIP IN AN ORDERLY FASHION

The major theme of 1 Corinthians 14 is orderly worship. Since we only have one side of the conversation-- Paul's instructions to the churches, we do not always see the whole picture. We are forced to imagine much of the things Paul was dealing with. However, his letter paints a fairly good picture of the services the church at Corinth and some problems they were having. Most of the services in the early church had a more casual order to them as opposed to contemporary churches that may have every minute of the service scheduled. Paul's main concern was to bring some fundamental order to their service while not hindering its charismatic and spontaneous nature. Some of the problems cited in 1 Cor 14 include:

1.Speaking in tongues with no interpretation
2.Church services with everyone speaking in tongues
3.General disorder and confusion due to a lack of decorum

Additional problems surfaced with some female members of the church. Paul does not address the problem, only the solution. Here is where one must do his or her exegetical duty. One verse that must be examined is 1 Corinthians 14:34:

(...) women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.

If we fail to see the purpose of Paul's writing, to bring order to the church at Corinth, we may think Paul was trying to limit woman's role in the church. The Mickelsen's give an important clue for our exegetical task: “Discussions about biblical teachings on the role of women in the church and society is complicated by the fact that Greek uses the same word, gyne, for 'women' and for 'wife,' and the word aner means either 'man' or 'husband'.”4

A better translation of the word “woman” (Greek: gunhv) in 1 Cor 14:34 is wife. We only have the context of the passage to go on since the Greek word is not definitive. Two clues from the passage should point us to “wife” instead of “woman.” First, Paul insists the females, “must be in submission, as the Law says.” The Law (Gen 3:16) refers only to wives: “Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.” Confirmation of this belief is found in the same verse when Paul explains that “they should ask their own husbands at home...”

1 Cor 14:34 is an obscure scripture since we do not know the precise problem of the church. After careful exegetical study of the language and literary context, we can only surmise that some of the wives at Corinth had a problem with subordination to their husbands. Let's consider the historical and cultural context of Paul's instruction concerning wives. Paul Marish explains5:

The verb lalein (to speak) is too general to refer to any particular kind of speaking. It is used of tongues (27) and also prophecy (29) and refers equally to the questions with which the women might interrupt a discourse. So general is the word that the suggestion that Paul is merely referring here to irregular talking, be it chattering, calling to children, soothing or more often rebuking babies, or interjecting a remark or query, cannot be ruled out. At church services in Asia the rebuke is frequently heard, ‘Sisters, be silent; don’t talk in church’. And the verb used is the general equivalent of lalein. Few things are so conducive to confusion and disruptive of peace as the noise which emanates from the women's section of the congregation—the sexes are segregated—in an Asian worship service.

For Paul to call attention to these wives illustrates their collective insubordinate and disruptive talking. We must press on to find the accepted role of women in the early Church.

THE ROLE OF WOMEN IN THE EARLY CHURCH

Paul gives us a very good indication of the acceptance of women in ministry through his writings. He is clear that prophecy is for both men and women (1 Cor 11:4-5). Prophecy was fundamental in the early church. In Joel 2:28, God promised to “... pour out my Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your old men will dream dreams, your young men will see visions. Even on my servants, both men and women, I will pour out my Spirit in those days.” Joel's prophecy was very alive in Paul's churches. The gifts of the Spirit are available to all believers: men and women. If the women could not speak in the churches, they could not prophesy nor could the gift's of the Spirit operate in them to edify the church. Such a prohibition would be a hindrance to the Church of God and contrary to the Prophets.

We must consider the possibility that Paul's attitude toward women was more conservative than the other apostles. After Paul's conversion/call, he did not immediately join the church leaders at Jerusalem. He received a revelation from Christ; he didn't seek approval or support from the established church. Since he seldom rubbed elbows with the elders, it is very likely that some non-essential doctrinal differences existed. Fee and Stewart write, “...the New Testament does not appear uniform on such matter as woman's ministries in the church.”6 Much of the apparent discrepancies can be reconciled by historical exegetics.

As an apostle, it was Paul's responsibility to play the role of peacemaker. The women at Corinth were causing trouble and it was Paul's responsibility to put a stop to it. Much of the false doctrines might have been attributed to the female members, especially since educational opportunities were mostly limited to men. The first century was a man's world. Women were generally expected to keep a low profile and be in full submission of their husband. If women were trying to “run the show” it would have been a religious and cultural scandal for many members of the church.

PAUL'S OTHER WRITINGS SUPPORT WOMEN IN MINISTRY

In the last chapter of Romans, Paul gives us a glimpse at the important role some women were playing within the church. Claire Powell give a summary:

We know from Acts and the Letters that women were prominent among the leaders in almost all the early house-church groups. Lydia was a leader in Philippi; Phoebe was a deacon in Cenchrea (Romans 16:1); Junia (the majority manuscript evidence points to Junia as a woman) was an apostle (Romans 16:7).7

While there is ongoing debate as to whether Junia was a female, or male (Junias), it should be noted that the early church fathers thought Junia was a woman8, the earliest manuscripts indicate a woman9, and the male name Junias can't be found in first-century Greek writings.

CONCLUSION

Women do not have a stained glass ceiling in the church of God. God calls men and women into His service. While some problems existed in the early Church with women becoming insubordinate to their husbands, Paul never intended to exclude women in leadership positions. His other writings instructed women how they should pray and prophesy. He mentioned women deacons and their contribution to the church. Since Paul clearly accepted women deacons, the door is wide open for female apostles too. Junia was the only female apostle mentioned in the New Testament; however, she was “outstanding among the apostles” (Rom 16:7). At least six of the early church fathers have either written about, or indicated that they believed that Junia was a woman. The best and oldest Biblical manuscripts that we have indicate Junia was a female; some later editions seem to add an “s” signifying a male name. In short, the early church more easily believed and understood that women were called to leadership positions than many Christians today.

Some of Paul's instruction to the church related to the culture of the first century. For example, Paul instructed women to cover their heads: (1 Cor 11:5)

And every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head—it is just as though her head were shaved. 6 If a woman does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut or shaved off, she should cover her head.

This is clearly applicable only within their culture; a woman would cover her head to show submission to her husband, and, in a larger sense, the culture. Not to do so would be seen as rebellion.

There is much support to conclude that Paul's instruction to women was relative to their culture. Due to educational limitations, woman were more likely to teach unorthodox doctrines. Their culture demanded them to be “seen and not heard.” Paul's limitations were only intended to show the wives' submission to their husband-- with a veiled head and no conversations in church. It is apparent that this restriction did not limit women from prophesying or from leading a church service in the first century.

Paul's culture was a world away from our Western 21st century; it is difficult even to imagine their worldview. It would be interesting to speak to Paul about our modern way-of-life. Are we too liberal today, or have we really evolved into a more enlightened, tolerant society? I think Paul would be very happy to see the progress we have made as a society, and the important role women are playing in the church today.

The following verse illustrates that women may praise, teach, and whatever God leads of them. “Everyone” includes women.

What then shall we say, brothers? When you come together, everyone has a hymn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue or an interpretation. (1Co 14:26)


1 Marcus J Borge, Jesus A New Vision (San Francisco: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1987), 134

2 A Berkley and Alvera M. Mickelsen Understanding Scripture- How to Study the Bible (Peabody, Ma: Hendrickson Publishing, Inc., 1992), 62

3 A Berkley and Alvera M. Mickelsen Understanding Scripture- How to Study the Bible (Peabody, Ma: Hendrickson Publishing, Inc., 1992), 62

4A Berkley and Alvera M. Mickelsen Understanding Scripture- How to Study the Bible (Peabody, Ma: Hendrickson Publishing, Inc., 1992), 38

5 Marsh, Paul W, “Women in church”, In New International Bible Commentary. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1979), n.p.

6 Gordon D. Fee and Douglas Stuart, How to Read the Bible for all it's Worth (Grand Rapids,MI: Zondervan, 2003), 82

7 Claire Powell, “The Bible Through Women's Eyes,” in Zondervan Handbook to the Bible, ed. by Pat and David Alexander (Oxford, England: Zondervan Publishing House, 1999), 90

8 John Chrysostem, “Homily 31 on Romans,” in New Advent, Online: http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/210231.htm , [October 10, 2007]

9 A Berkley and Alvera M. Mickelsen Understanding Scripture- How to Study the Bible (Peabody, Ma: Hendrickson Publishing, Inc., 1992), 62



BIBLIOGRAPHY
Borg, Marcus. Jesus A New Vision. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987

Chrysostem, John. “ Homily 31 on Romans.” in New Advent. Online: http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/210231.htm , [October 10, 2007].

Fee, Gordon and Stuart, Douglas. How to Read the Bible for all it's Worth. Grand Rapids,MI: Zondervan, 2003.

Kruse, C. G. “Ministry.” In Dictionary of Paul and his Letters. Edited by Geald F. Hawthorne and Ralph P. Martin. Downers Grove, Il., 1993.

Powell, Claire. “The Bible through woman’s eyes.” In Zondervan Handbook to the Bible. Edited by Pat and David Alexander. Oxford, England: Zondervan Publishing House, 1999.

Marsh, Paul W. “Women in church (14:33b-36)” In New International Bible Commentary. 1380. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1979.

Mickelsen, Berkeley and Alvera. Understanding Scripture- How to Read and Study the Bible. Peabody, Mass: Hendrickson Publishers, 1992.

The Holy Bible, New International Version®. Pradis CD-ROM:1Co 14:26. Grand Rapids: The Zondervan Corporation, © 1973, 1978, 1984.

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Free college classes

Yale University is offering the public to view a few classes on religious studies. The website, Academic Earth, currently offers two classes on religion. The classes are an introduction to the Old and New Testaments.

These classes are for personal enrichment, not college credit (unless you are enrolled at Yale ;) Other personal enrichment classes may be found by Googling "free bible college." You might be surprised at how many free classes are available via the Web. One of the oldest is, Ames International School of Ministry. I think they charge $20 per class.

Just remember, free classes are not accredited (no matter what they say). Is accreditation necessary? It is generally required for those who want to become a chaplain or school teacher, or transfer their credits to another school in the future.

For the mother load of free religious classes, check out iTunes.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Should Sex Offenders Be Barred from Church?

A new Time.com article tells the story of North Carolinian, James Nichols, who was arrested in 2009. His crime? Going to church.

Nichols is a registered sex offender. In North Carolina, that means that he can't come within 300 ft. of any type of child care facility. The police charged Nichols with criminal charges because this church has a nursery.

Nichols' attorney asks the question, "Will pastors be charged as an accessory for letting a known sex offender sit in a front-row pew and worship?"

Here we have it. Some sinners can no longer attend church. This is not a Christian attitude. We can't expect God to forgive us while we hold that others can never be forgiven. That doesn't mean that we put sex offenders in charge of the church's nursery or youth group. If we allow "rehabilitated" murderers to attend church should we not allow sex offenders also?

Can sex offenders be rehabilitated? Are all sex offenders the same? Are some sex offenders at church only to seek out new victims? I have more questions than I have answers for this one.

The government has no place in determining who can and can't attend church. They may kick us all out eventually.

Friday, October 9, 2009

My Testimony

I am a third year student at Regent University. My major is religious studies. I've been following the Lord for 20 years now.

He is wonderful!

In any case, now that I am a Christian I can say that I never chose Christianity. I hated religion. I even had very serious doubts about the existence of God notwithstanding 10+ years of Sunday School (indoctrination).

My biggest mistake was going to a "crazy" charismatic tent revival when I was 18. Those people really scared me. They would run the isles and act even more crazy than the Baptists.

The preacher came up to me afterwards and asked if he could lay hands on me. I said sure. But I wasn't going to run around the tent acting crazy.

And I didn't.

As he prayed with me, I began to feel God's love like rain-- it felt tangible. For once I knew God existed. It felt like He took time out from whatever He does, and introduced Himself to me. You could add up all of the love in the world, and it would pale in comparison to how God loves one person.

I wish I could say that my life has been perfect since then. I just know when I call on His name, I always find Him. He is always willing to pick me up from any mud hole I may have fallen into.

I couldn't make it one day without Him. I don't know how others make it. My goal is to introduce to others this wonderful man named Jesus.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Does God Do Miracles Today?

Does God Do Miracles Today? - A response to John MacArthur's question and sermon by the same name.

John MacArthur is a well informed cessationist. We can look at all the facts and still draw the wrong conclusion. Cessationists, in short, believe that miracles have ceased long ago at the end of the apostolic age. Cessationist are people who have never experienced God's power in their own life or ministry; therefore, they insist that miracles must have ceased. Indeed books upon books have been written claiming that God is retired or on an extended vacation.

Let's take a look at some of MacArthur's claims from the referenced article.

A miracle is an event in nature so extraordinary in itself and so coinciding with the prophecy or command of a religious teacher or leader as fully to warrant the conviction on the part of those who witness it, that God has wrought it with the design of certifying that this teacher or leader has been commissioned by him.

First, MacArthur defines miracles so narrowly they some of Jesus' miracles should be written off as flukes. One such instance was when Christ instructed Peter to find money in a fish's mouth ( Matt 17: 27, KJV). This was not a miracle per MacArthur. The Bible doesn't say that miracles were to certify a teacher from God. Jesus' miracles were the result of His love for people. Jesus was recorded as being moved with compassion 14 times in the Gospels before healing the sick. MacArthur's definition of a miracle is not Biblical.

Next, MacArthur lists many dubious “miracles” such as a fried tortilla that looked like Jesus. Thank you Mr. MacArthur, but I'm not a fool. How does a fried tortilla give one the right to dismiss all miracles everywhere? This is a straw-man argument along others such as, “Is there a need for ongoing miracles to substantiate the Bible?”

Nothing in Scripture indicates that the miracles of the apostles' age were meant to be continuous.

These were miracles of the church age. There is not one verse of Scripture in the entire Bible to support the notion that miracles were only for the "apostolic age" or that miracles were to cease.

(1Cor 12:28 [KJV])
And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.

According the the Bible, miracles are attached to the church, not some manufactured idea of an "apostolic age." As long as the Church of God is still on earth, there will be miracles.

Finally, MacArthur says, “You hear Charismatics say, 'God has a special miracle for you today.' No, He doesn't.” Wow! MacArthur speaks for God, but he doesn't speak too highly of God. Amazing. His message comes straight from the pit of unbelief.

Does the Bible support him?

(Ps 34:19 [KJV])
Many [are] the afflictions of the righteous: but the LORD delivereth him out of them all.

(John 14:14 [KJV])
If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do [it].

(Mark 16:17 [KJV])
And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.

If we insist that God is no longer working miracles, then we must also conclude that Christ is no longer moved with compassion. MacArthur's teachings are clearly opposite of the Bible. This author doesn't believe every miracle out there, and is aware of the many shenanigan selling holy water. These things don't diminish God's will to heal or perform miracles today. Since God is a supernatural God, everything He does, by definition, is a miracle.

Mr. MacAurthur denies God's power with academic wordiness that is both empty and dubious.

Monday, August 24, 2009

Asbury Revival

This may be the most interesting video you will ever see. It is a documentary of the revival at Asbury College in Wilmore, Kentucky. This video was used in one of my classes at Regent University. I found this video to be a huge blessing.

For the ones who believe that God has retired, you should watch this video. Revivals are more than posting signs on the church lawn or waiting for Benny Hinn to come to town. I doubt Hinn would know revival if it fell from the sky. But this blog isn't about Benny Hinn.

Take a look and let me know what you think...